Research article series in partnership with Chartis Research

This is the third in a series of Point of View articles from Chartis and Regnology that explore the cost of complying with regulatory reporting requirements, and the context in which regulatory reporting is evolving.

This article discusses the different deployment options for financial institutions in their regulatory reporting needs, pros and cons for the cloud options, and the shift from traditional in-house systems to managed services for greater flexibility, cost efficiency, and access to specialized expertise.

A service model whereby regulatory reporting tasks are outsourced to specialist third-party providers. [...]This approach is part of a broader trend toward ‘as a service’ regulatory reporting solutions, reflecting a wider reliance on external expertise and technology.

The cost of regulatory reporting Chartis Research

Download the research article

Contenus similaires

  • The cost of regulatory reporting (1/3)

    Contenu

    The cost of regulatory reporting (1/3)

    Discover financial institutions’ regulatory reporting obligations and challenges, and a framework they can use to assess both the cost of compliance and of upgrading their systems to facilitate it.

    Lire
  • The cost of regulatory reporting (2/3)

    Contenu

    The cost of regulatory reporting (2/3)

    Explore the pros and cons of the two main types of regulatory reporting systems, and how RegTech solutions are helping to support a move to third-party offerings.

    Lire
  • The cost of regulatory reporting (3/3)

    Contenu

    The cost of regulatory reporting (3/3)

    Discover the different deployment options for financial institutions in their regulatory reporting needs, pros and cons for the cloud options, and the shift from traditional in-house systems to managed services for greater flexibility, cost efficiency, and access to specialized expertise.

    Lire

Contactez-nous