The transition from in-house to third-party reg reporting

Research article series in partnership with Chartis Research

This is the second in a series of Point of View articles from Chartis and Regnology that explore the cost of complying with regulatory reporting requirements, and the context in which regulatory reporting is evolving.

This article considers the pros and cons of the two main types of regulatory reporting systems, and how RegTech solutions are helping to support a move to third-party offerings.

While large financial institutions with robust teams and long histories of maintaining in-house systems have been slower to adopt third-party solutions, a growing number of small and medium-sized firms have been inclined to move to third-party systems for their reporting and compliance needs.

The cost of regulatory reporting Chartis Research

Download the research article

You might also be interested in

Insight

The cost of regulatory reporting (1/3)

Discover financial institutions’ regulatory reporting obligations and challenges, and a framework they can use to assess both the cost of compliance and of upgrading their systems to facilitate it.

Read more
Insight

The cost of regulatory reporting (2/3)

Explore the pros and cons of the two main types of regulatory reporting systems, and how RegTech solutions are helping to support a move to third-party offerings.
Read more
Insight

The cost of regulatory reporting (3/3)

Discover the different deployment options for financial institutions in their regulatory reporting needs, pros and cons for the cloud options, and the shift from traditional in-house systems to managed services for greater flexibility, cost efficiency, and access to specialized expertise.
Read more

Research article series in partnership with Chartis Research

Download the research article

You might also be interested in

The cost of regulatory reporting (1/3)

The cost of regulatory reporting (2/3)

The cost of regulatory reporting (3/3)

Contact us